24315-1 METR ConOps |
Submit Comment Traceability Tables: |
ID | Description | Discussion | Links | Custom Attributes |
---|---|---|---|---|
T-35 |
3.1 Jurisdictional terms |
|
||
T-46 |
3.1.1 jurisdictionlegal power to issue societal rules of behaviour for a defined area |
|
||
T-47 |
3.1.2 jurisdictional areaterritory for which a jurisdictional entity (3.1.6) has the power to define societal rules of behaviour Note 1 to entry: A jurisdictional area might include non-contiguous locations. |
|
||
T-123 |
3.1.3 governmental areajurisdictional area (3.1.4) whose jurisdictional entity (3.1.6) is a governmental entity, and the facility (3.x.x) is part of the jurisdictional entity's transport system (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.2.2) EXAMPLE A subway station is a governmental area |
|
||
T-45 |
3.1.4 campusprivate campus jurisdictional area (3.1.4) whose jurisdictional entity (3.1.6) is the owner of the area, except for government-owned, transport-related areas Note 1 to entry: A campus is a site typified by a school, hospital, store, or some other set of one or more buildings and might include parking or other transport facilities where the owner of the campus has the jurisdictional authority to establish its own rules. The rules can be in lieu of or in addition to rules established by the representative governmental entities. EXAMPLE A government-owned university is a campus |
|
||
T-121 |
3.1.5 sub-area<METR> area entirely within a jurisdictional area (3.x.x) that has a consistent level of support for METR data (3.x.x) throughout Note 1 to entry: A sub-area can be a jurisdictional area, which can have its own sub-areas. |
|
||
T-182 |
3.1.6 defined area<METR> jurisdictional area or sub-area |
|
||
T-48 |
3.1.7 jurisdictional boundaryterritorial limit associated with a jurisdictional area (3.1.4) Note 1 to entry: A geofence can be used to electronically represent a jurisdictional boundary. |
|
||
T-31 |
3.1.8 jurisdictional entityperson (ISO 14812, 3.1.1.6) or organization who has jurisdiction (3.1.3) EXAMPLE A city government Note 1 to entry: In the case of a geopolitical jurisdiction, the jurisdictional entity is typically the recognized government for the territory; in the case of a campus, the jurisdictional entity is typically the landowner. Note 2 to entry: A jurisdictional entity assigns its authority to one or more rule-makers, which may be itself (e.g., the individual owner or a campus) or other divisions of the entity (e.g., police department, traffic department). |
|
||
T-184 |
3.1.9 authorised scopeauthorised categories and defined areas |
|
||
T-36 |
3.2 Data terms |
|
||
T-124 |
3.2.1 General data terms |
|
||
T-126 |
3.2.1.1 datare-interpretable representation of information in a formalized manner suitable for communication, interpretation or processing [SOURCE ISO 2382-1:2015, 2121272, Notes removed] |
|
||
T-117 |
3.2.1.2 data category<METR> set of specified characteristics used to group data (3.2.1.1) EXAMPLE Speed limit rules for motor vehicles within a specified jurisdictional area Note 1 to entry: The data category represents the set of characteristics; the term "rule set" is used to describe the rules that currently meet the specified characteristics. |
|
||
T-130 |
3.2.1.3 rule setall rules (3.x.x) within a specified data category (3.2.1.2) |
|
||
T-127 |
3.2.1.4 relevant<METR> applicable to the METR user (3.x.x) within the circumstances |
|
||
T-11 |
3.2.1.5 ruleregulation, advisory, or guidance established by a rule-maker (3.x.x) for its jurisdictional area (3.x.x) Note 1 to entry: The jurisdictional area can be a campus. Note 2 to entry: The primary focus of METR is to provide rules that are likely to impact the dynamic driving task (DDT, ISO 14812:2021, 3.7.3.1). The exact boundary of which rules are a part of METR is left to those deploying METR distribution systems. |
SP:
SP-54 METR should distinguish between "rules" …
|
|
|
T-49 |
3.2.1.6 authoritative informationtrustworthy (3.x.x) rules(s) (3.x.x) from a jurisdictional entity (3.x.x) |
|
||
T-172 |
3.2.1.7 legal rulerepresentation of a rule as recorded in official records of the jurisdictional entity |
|
||
T-173 |
3.2.1.8 electronic rulerepresentation of a rule as presented within METR |
|
||
T-174 |
3.2.1.9 physical rulerepresentation of a rule as presented in the field EXAMPLE traffic control device |
|
||
T-131 |
3.2.1.10 supplemental data<METR> data (3.x.x) that is not a rule (3.x.x) but affects the meaning or active status of rules Note 1 to entry: Supplemental data includes data provided by on-board equipment, roadside devices, map providers, and other sources. Note 2 to entry: Supplemental data is often dynamic (i.e., changing more frequently than the validity periods of rule sets). |
SP:
SP-54 METR should distinguish between "rules" …
SP-75 The term "C-ITS data source" should perh…
SP-133 Define "static rule", "dynamic rule" and…
|
|
|
T-26 |
3.2.1.11 on-board datasupplemental data (3.x.x) that is provided by on-board equipment EXAMPLE: current time, windshield wiper status |
SP:
SP-133 Define "static rule", "dynamic rule" and…
|
|
|
T-137 |
3.2.2 Rule termination qualifier terms |
|
||
T-17 |
3.2.2.1 persistent rule<METR> rule (3.x.x) that does not have any expectation of a termination (3.x.x) Note 1 to entry: A variable rule, such as a variable speed limit, often consists of a persistent rule (e.g., a variable speed limit applies to a specified stretch of a road) that is supplemented with supplemental data that identifies the current speed limit in effect. |
SP:
SP-66 When discussing rule types, we need to c…
SP-133 Define "static rule", "dynamic rule" and…
|
|
|
T-18 |
3.2.2.2 temporary rule<METR> rule (3.x.x) that has or is expected to have a specified termination (3.x.x) |
SP:
SP-66 When discussing rule types, we need to c…
SP-133 Define "static rule", "dynamic rule" and…
|
|
|
T-134 |
3.2.3 Rule activation state qualifier terms |
|
||
T-133 |
3.2.3.1 pre-announced rule<METR> rule that is publicized for a period longer than the expiration period for its containing rule set before it becomes active Note 1 to entry: Pre-announced rules do not require low-latency communications because they are distributed well enough in advance so that all users with up-to-date rule sets will have a copy of the rule. |
SP:
SP-133 Define "static rule", "dynamic rule" and…
|
|
|
T-19 |
3.2.3.2 ad-hoc rule<METR> rule that becomes active prior to the expiration of a relevant, valid rule set EXAMPLE Police officer imposing a road closure Note 1 to entry: Ad-hoc rules are typically made in response to current conditions and typically require low-latency to ensure that METR users are notified in time to allow for operational decisions. Note 2 to entry: Ad-hoc rules are typically temporary. |
SP:
SP-54 METR should distinguish between "rules" …
SP-66 When discussing rule types, we need to c…
SP-133 Define "static rule", "dynamic rule" and…
|
|
|
T-138 |
3.2.4 Other rule qualifier terms |
|
||
T-79 |
3.2.4.1 electronic<METR> disseminated in digital form such that a receiver can parse the digital information to readily extract data Note 1 to entry: Digitized images do not meet this definition of electronic. |
|
||
T-139 |
3.2.4.2 variable<METR> containing a parameter whose value is dependent upon supplemental data (3.x.x) issued by the rule-maker (3.x.x) who issued the rule (3.x.x) Note 1 to entry: The supplemental data can be generated by an automated system under the authority of the rule-maker. EXAMPLE A speed limit that changes based on rule-maker decisions EXAMPLE A traffic signal, which changes states as determined by a traffic signal controller |
|
||
T-51 |
3.2.4.3 condition-basedbeing active based on explicitly stated conditions EXAMPLE “when workers present”, “dusk”, “in winter”, "08:00 - 12:00" Note 1 to entry: Condition-based rules can be based on multiple conditions. Note 2 to entry: Time-based rules (e.g., a parking rule that is only in effect during certain hours) are one type of condition-based rules. |
|
||
T-40 |
3.2.5 Publication terms |
|
||
T-16 |
3.2.5.1 postedpublicized (3.x.x) to the those affected using traffic control devices (3.x.x) |
SP:
SP-133 Define "static rule", "dynamic rule" and…
|
|
|
T-60 |
3.2.5.2 publicizebeing announced to the public |
|
||
T-15 |
3.2.5.3 unpostednot publicized (3.x.x) to those affected through traffic control devices (3.x.x) Note 1 to entry: Unposted regulations are often part of the legal codes of a jurisdiction that travellers are expected to know without posted regulations. |
SP:
SP-66 When discussing rule types, we need to c…
SP-133 Define "static rule", "dynamic rule" and…
|
|
|
T-61 |
3.2.5.4 observableposted (3.x.x) and able to be perceived by those affected |
|
||
T-62 |
3.2.5.5 unobservableposted (3.x.x) but not able to be perceived by a significant portion of those affected Note 1 to entry: Unobservable official notices have been posted but might not be perceived properly due to any number of reasons, such as damage, fading, snow accumulation, obstructions, graffiti, removal, etc. |
|
||
T-41 |
3.2.6 Rule state terms |
|
||
T-66 |
3.2.6.1 inception<METR> epoch at which a rule (3.x.x) was approved EXAMPLE A rule can be approved through legislation, the completion of a traffic warrant, a traffic response plan, or other means. A rule can remain inactive for a prolonged period after its inception, as in the case of rules associated with an evacuation plan. |
|
||
T-72 |
3.2.6.2 termination<METR> epoch at which a rule (3.x.x) is expected to be or was withdrawn EXAMPLE A daily parking restriction that is intended to be in effect daily from 07:00 to 19:00 and ending 31 July would require a termination time of no earlier than 19:00 on 31 July. |
|
||
T-64 |
3.2.6.3 currenthaving an inception (3.x.x) in the past and a termination (3.x.x) either undefined or in the future Note 1 to entry: A current rule can be active, inactive, or overridden. |
|
||
T-63 |
3.2.6.4 activecurrent (3.2.6.1) and presently in effect Note 1 to entry: A rule can be active during certain hours of the day or upon other defined conditions. Note 2 to entry: Regulations are only enforced when active. |
|
||
T-65 |
3.2.6.5 inactivecurrent (3.2.6.1) but not presently in effect Note 1 to entry: A rule might not be in effect during certain hours of the day. Note 2 to entry: A regulation cannot be enforced while it is inactive. Note 3 to entry: Guidance information that is not applicable at certain times (e.g., detour that is in effect during certain hours) can be designated as "inactive" during those times. |
|
||
T-67 |
3.2.6.6 overriddencurrent (3.2.6.1) but temporarily nullified and replaced Note 1 to entry: It is expected that an override will eventually terminate, even if the expected termination epoch is unknown. Note 2 to entry: The item that is temporarily nullified is termed to be “overridden” and the item that it is replaced with is termed to be “overriding”. Note 3 to entry: The replacement can be null. |
|
||
T-70 |
3.2.6.7 rescindedhaving a termination (3.x.x) in the past |
|
||
T-163 |
3.2.7 Rule set state terms |
|
||
T-13 |
3.2.7.1 expirationepoch at which data (3.x.x) is considered to lose its trustworthiness (3.x.x) Note 1 to entry: Receivers can refresh their data prior to their expiration to avoid untrustworthy data. |
SP:
SP-57 Validity should apply to rules; we need …
SP-94 Each individual rule should have its own…
|
|
|
T-12 |
3.2.7.2 validhaving a future expiration (3.2.7.1) EXAMPLE A rule set that is downloaded can be designated as being valid for one week. The data would be considered untrustworthy after the one-week period. |
SP:
SP-57 Validity should apply to rules; we need …
SP-94 Each individual rule should have its own…
|
|
|
T-42 |
3.3 Enterprise view terms |
|
||
T-140 |
3.3.1 Role terms |
|
||
T-9 |
3.3.1.1 rule-maker<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for issuing rules (3.x.x) for a jurisdictional area (3.x.x) for a specified scope Note 1 to entry: A jurisdictional entity can divide its rule-making responsibilities among multiple rule-makers. For example, the one department can be responsible for setting speed limits while another department can be responsible for setting parking rules. |
SP:
SP-41 The definition of a "regulator" needs to…
SP-158 We need to define "regulator"
|
|
|
T-159 |
3.3.1.2 installer<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for posting rules (3.x.x) for a jurisdictional area (3.x.x) using traffic control devices (3.x.x) Note 1 to entry: The role includes posting signs and markings to publicize the rules established by the rule-maker. |
|
||
T-142 |
3.3.1.3 translator<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for translating rules (3.x.x) defined by rule-makers (3.3.1.3) into an electronic format for METR |
|
||
T-73 |
3.3.1.4 collector<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for gathering rules (3.x.x) from one or more translators (3.3.1.4) and providing them to one or more disseminators (3.3.1.7) |
|
||
T-141 |
3.3.1.5 data provider<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for providing trustworthy data (3.x.x) to METR users (3.3.1.15) Note 1 to entry: The required degree of trustworthiness can vary based on the intended use of the data as well as applicable legal requirements (e.g., certification requirements). |
|
||
T-77 |
3.3.1.6 disseminator<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for distributing rules (3.x.x) to METR users (3.3.1.15) via receivers (3.x.x) and interpreters (3.x.x) |
|
||
T-156 |
3.3.1.7 pre-announced rule disseminator<METR> disseminator (3.3.1.6) that is responsible for distributing all pre-announced rules (3.x.x) requested by a METR user (3.3.1.15) and within the publicized data categories (3.x.x) supported by the disseminator Note 1 to entry: The pre-announced rule disseminator role is primarily envisioned to be fulfilled by a central system, but can be fulfilled by a mobile unit dispatched to a location without internet connectivity. Note 2 to entry: A pre-announced rule disseminator can also distribute ad-hoc rules but does not bear the responsibility for doing so. |
|
||
T-148 |
3.3.1.8 ad-hoc rule disseminator<METR> disseminator (3.3.1.7) that is responsible for distributing ad-hoc rules (3.x.x) Note 1 to entry: Ad-hoc rule disseminators are primarily envisioned to be broadcast sites with a short transmission range. As such, the rules distributed are envisioned to be the ad-hoc rules that are applicable to the broadcast area, which is likely a subset of all ad-hoc rules within a METR network coverage area. |
|
||
T-178 |
3.3.1.9 non-METR distributor<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for distributing rules (3.x.x) in manners that do not conform to METR EXAMPLE distribution system that provides rules using protocols that do not meet METR security requirements |
|
||
T-21 |
3.3.1.10 supplemental data provider<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for distributing supplemental data (3.x.x) to METR users (3.x.x) via interpreters (3.x.x) Note 1 to entry: Supplemental data providers include on-board data providers and external data providers. |
SP:
SP-75 The term "C-ITS data source" should perh…
|
|
|
T-157 |
3.3.1.11 external data provider<METR> supplemental data provider (3.3.1.10) that is external to the material entity (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.1.3) hosting the receiver (3.3.1.14) Note 1 to entry: The material entity hosting the receiver is typically a vehicle, but can be a personal information device, such as a smartphone. |
|
||
T-149 |
3.3.1.12 on-board data provider<METR> supplemental data provider (3.3.1.10) that is on-board the user's material entity (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.1.3) hosting the receiver (3.3.1.14) and produces and provides supplemental data Note 1 to entry: The material entity hosting the receiver is typically a vehicle, but can be a personal information device, such as a smartphone. Note 2 to entry: On-board data providers can produce supplemental data that is derived from external data sources, for example by using sensors, clocks, GNSS receivers, and/or other devices with its own algorithms. EXAMPLE GNSS positioning data (i.e., GNSS positioning data is determined by an on-board algorithm that analyses multiple GNSS signals to produce an estimate of a geographic position). |
|
||
T-8 |
3.3.1.13 receiver<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for retrieving, receiving, processing and maintaining a local store of METR data (3.x.x) |
|
||
T-170 |
3.3.1.14 interpreter<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for interpreting data provided by the receiver (3.x.x) and supplemental data providers (3.x.x) into a format that the METR user (3.x.x) can support Note 1 to entry: The interpretation can be to another electronic format (e.g., translation among different electronic interface standards) or to a human-machine interface format, as might be performed by a driver support system. Note 2 to entry: The interpreter can also provide discrepancies to a discrepancy reporter |
|
||
T-30 |
3.3.1.15 METR useruser role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for using interpreted rules to fulfil a need Note 1 to entry: METR users include transport users (ISO 14812:2021, 3.5.2.3) and ancillary users. Note 2 to entry: The need being fulfilled is often the performance of the dynamic driving task or similar action (e.g., the task of walking in a safe manner that complies with local rules) but can also be trip planning, rule verification, etc. |
|
||
T-171 |
3.3.1.16 transport-related user<METR> METR user (3.3.1.10) that is either a transport user (ISO 14812:2021, 3.5.2.3), a driver (ISO 14812:2021, 3.6.2.3), a driving automation system (ISO 14812:2021, 3.7.3.6), or a driver information system |
|
||
T-143 |
3.3.1.17 ancillary user<METR> METR user (3.3.1.10) that is not a transport-related user (3.3.1.11) Note 1 to entry: Ancillary users typically provide verification of the system or support transport users in their transport needs. EXAMPLE insurance company, lawyer, police officer |
|
||
T-167 |
3.3.1.18 discovery reporter<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for reporting rule information detected in the field using on-board sensors |
|
||
T-168 |
3.3.1.19 discrepancy reporter<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for reporting variances between rule information detected using on-board sensors and the rules that it had previously received via METR |
|
||
T-169 |
3.3.1.20 report handler<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for receiving reports from discovery reporters (3.3.1.11) and discrepancy reporters (3.3.1.12) and passing the information to a rule verifier in an aggregate and anonymous form |
|
||
T-166 |
3.3.1.21 verifier<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for verifying the contents of reports from discovery reporters (3.3.1.11) and discrepancy reporters (3.3.1.12) |
|
||
T-162 |
3.3.1.22 enforcer<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for compelling compliance with a rule (3.x.x) Note 1 to entry: An enforcer can be authorized to enforce rules for multiple jurisdictional entities. For example, a police officer can be authorized to enforce national laws. Note 2 to entry: An enforcer can be from an independent organization. For example, a campus can contract with a private enforcement agency or have its own enforcement agency. |
|
||
T-161 |
3.3.1.23 adjudicator<METR> role (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.6.7) that is responsible for making formal judgements on disputed matters related to rules (3.x.x) |
|
||
T-147 |
3.3.2 System terms |
|
||
T-81 |
3.3.2.1 METRmanagement of electronic transport regulations collection of ITS services (ISO 14812:2021, 3.5.3.1) that provide for the distribution of rules (3.x.x) in an electronic format for the surface transport system (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.2.3) |
|
||
T-76 |
3.3.2.2 disseminator discovery serviceservice to find resources, entities or services based on a specification of the desired target [ISO/IEC 20924:2021, 3.1.16] |
|
||
T-3 |
3.3.2.3 METR networkaggregation of at least one METR distribution system with at least one METR user |
|
||
T-151 |
3.3.2.4 METR componentITS component (ISO 14812:2021, 3.1.8.2) that fulfils one or more of the METR roles |
|
||
T-2 |
3.3.2.5 METR distribution systemset of one or more ITS components that jointly fulfil the translator (3.x.x), collector (3.x.x), and disseminator (3.x.x) roles |
|
||
T-4 |
3.3.2.6 METR environmentaggregation of the METR network and supplemental data providers |
|
||
T-43 |
3.4 Transport environment terms |
|
||
T-165 |
3.4.1 field discovery mode<METR> service where one or more METR receivers assist in verifying and/or enhancing the accuracy of the METR distribution system by providing data obtained in the field Note 1 to entry: The data can be sent through and summarized by an intermediary, such as an OEM. Note 2 to entry: The data can be used as the initial source for data. Note 3 to entry: The data can be used to update METR data to reflect real-time changes such as due to natural disasters. |
|
||
T-87 |
3.4.2 traffic control devicephysical mechanism used to convey information to travellers |
|
||
T-88 |
3.4.3 transport facility<transport> physical structure or installation, including related site works, serving one or more transport-related purposes |
|
||
T-89 |
3.4.4 transport infrastructure<transport> system of facilities, equipment and services needed for the operation of a transport network |
|
||
T-90 |
3.4.5 work zonearea of transport infrastructure with notifications that alert travellers to construction, maintenance, or utility work activities |
|
||
T-85 |
3.4.6 micromobilitytransport using moderately low-speed (ISO 14812, 3.7.5.3), lightweight, limited sized vehicles EXAMPLE SAE 3194:2019 associates this with a curb weight of less than 500 pounds and a top speed of 30 mph or less EXAMPLE e-scooter Note 1 to entry: Local rules for the exact speed, weight, and size constraints vary. |
|
||
T-86 |
3.4.7 pathway robotGround-based automated micromobility systems (missing “low speed”) Personal delivery device (PDD) Sidewalk robot Delivery bot Delivery robot Sidewalk drone Ground-based drone Ground-based delivery vehicle / robot / drone ADS-equipped vehicle designed to operate safely within a pedestrian environment |
|
||
T-44 |
3.5 Trustworthiness terms |
|
||
T-91 |
3.5.1 accountabilityproperty that ensures that the actions of an entity can be traced uniquely to the entity Note 1 to entry: Accountability allows an entity to be held responsible for its actions and potentially be required to explain them to others. [SOURCE: ISO 7498-2:1989, note added] |
|
||
T-92 |
3.5.2 accuracyproperty that identifies the extent to which the recorded data reflect the actual underlying information |
|
||
T-93 |
3.5.3 authenticityproperty that an entity is what it claims to be [SOURCE: ISO/IEC 27000:2018, 3.5] |
|
||
T-94 |
3.5.4 availabilityproperty of being accessible and usable on demand by an authorized entity [SOURCE: ISO/IEC 27000:2018, 3.7] |
|
||
T-7 |
3.5.5 completenessdegree to which an IT service supports all the specified goals, objectives and data specified by the user |
SP:
SP-23 State of rules in force on the transport…
SP-32 User systems need high confidence that t…
|
|
|
T-95 |
3.5.6 confidentialityproperty that information is not made available or disclosed to unauthorized individuals, entities, or processes (3.54) [SOURCE: ISO/IEC 27000:2018, 3.10] |
|
||
T-96 |
3.5.7 data privacyprivacy property that information is not collected, retained, or disposed of in an unauthorized manner Note 1 to entry: Information collection includes aggregating and fusing data to create new data. Note 2 to entry: When the information relates to a person, the person that the data describes is responsible for granting authorization Note 3 to entry: When the information relates to a vehicle, the person that owns the vehicle is responsible for granting authorization |
|
||
T-97 |
3.5.8 information securitysecurity preservation of confidentiality (3.10), integrity (3.36) and availability (3.7) of information [SOURCE: ISO/IEC 27000:2018, 3.28, modified to allow the use of “security” within this document] |
|
||
T-98 |
3.5.9 integrityproperty of accuracy and completeness [SOURCE: ISO/IEC 27000:2018, 3.36] |
|
||
T-99 |
3.5.10 non-repudiationdegree to which actions or events can be proven to have taken place, so that the events or actions cannot be repudiated later [SOURCE: ISO/IEC 25010] |
|
||
T-100 |
3.5.11 qualityproperty of satisfying stated and implied needs for a product, service, system, component, or process |
|
||
T-101 |
3.5.12 reliabilityproperty of consistent intended behaviour and results [SOURCE: ISO/IEC 27000:2018, 3.55, modified to include “intended”] |
|
||
T-102 |
3.5.13 resilienceproperty of a system to plan for, adapt to, resist or quickly recover from a potentially disruptive event, whether natural or man-made [SOURCE: ISO 15392:2019, 3.21, modified to include planning] |
|
||
T-103 |
3.5.14 safetyexpectation that a system does not, under defined conditions, lead to a state in which human life, health, property, or the environment is endangered – [SOURCE: ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2017, 3.1.48] |
|
||
T-104 |
3.5.15 timelinessdegree to which an IT service delivers outcomes within time limits to meet user needs Note 1 to entry: In some cases, service timeliness is affected by a combination of multiple services provided by different service providers. For example, the service of providing traffic signal status is expected to provide not only timely traffic signal status from the traffic signal controller to the RSU, but also timely delivery of the RSU to the vehicle OBU so that the driver or ADS is able to react and safely navigate the intersection. [SOURCE: ISO/IEC TS 25011:2017, 3.2.6.1, added "to meet user needs" and contextualized note to ITS] |
|
||
T-105 |
3.5.16 transparencyopen, comprehensive and understandable presentation of information [ISO 14040:2006, 3.7] |
|
||
T-106 |
3.5.17 trustdegree to which a user or other stakeholder has confidence that a product or system will behave as intended [SOURCE: ISO/IEC 25010:2011, 4.1.3.2] |
2022-02-02: Kenneth Vaughn
Do we need to define this term? |
|
|
T-107 |
3.5.18 trustworthinessability to meet users' expectations in a verifiable way Note 1 to entry: Depending on the context or sector, and also on the specific product or service, data (3.x.x) and technology used, different characteristics apply and require verification to ensure stakeholders' expectations are met. Note 2 to entry: Characteristics of trustworthiness include, for instance, reliability, availability, resilience, security, privacy, safety, accountability, transparency, integrity, authenticity, quality, usability and accuracy. Note 3 to entry: Trustworthiness is an attribute that can be applied to services, products, technology, data and information as well as, in the context of governance, to organizations. Note 4 to entry: The Figure shows the relationships among the characteristics of trustworthiness that are defined within this document: [SOURCE: ISO/IEC 30145-2:2020, 3.9, note 4 added] |
|
||
T-109 |
3.5.19 usabilityproperty that a system can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction in a specified context of use [SOURCE: ISO 9241-210:2019, 3.13, notes removed, text revised to start with “property that a system”] |
|
Should the installer be responsible for notifying the METR network that traffic control devices have been installed?